![]() |
Osprey Descending Over Ginowan City Photo by Osamu Makishi |
On August 12, the US military resumed its deployment of the controversial MV-22 Osprey aircraft to Okinawa. The deployment had been put on hold after a US Air Force HH-60 helicopter crashedin the mountain area of Ginoza village, part of US Marine Corps’ Camp Hansen on August 5 , evoking outrage from Okinawan islanders.
The arrival of 9 new Ospreys was
visible and audible in most parts of Ginowan City where the US Marine Corp’s Futenma
Air Station is located. The Ospreys flew and descended over the city and landed
at the Futenma Station at around 10:30 am amid heated protest at the station's Nodake
gate.
In the process, Okinawa’s democratic voice
was crushed once again by the US military and the Japanese government.
Okinawa’s Opposition
Since the official announcement of the
Osprey deployment plan in June 2011 by the Japanese government, Okinawa has
been putting up a stern and unified opposition against the deployment. There have been a 100,000 people mass rally
and numerous sit-ins/rallies against the deployment. Okinawa Governor and the
mayors of all the municipalities have taken every opportunity to voice their
opposition. The Okinawa prefectural assembly and all the municipal assemblies
of Okinawa have passed resolutions against the deployment.
When the first round of Osprey deployment
took place in September 2012, the protesters blocked all the three gates of the
Futenma Air Station for three days (see this Stars and Stripes article). Protest rallies at the station's Nodake gate continues everyday.
![]() |
Protesters at Futenma Air Station's Nodake Gate Photo by Osamu Makishi |
Concerns for the overall safety of the Osprey aircraft and for the high levels of noise and low frequency sound generated by the aircraft are main reasons behind the opposition. These concerns are becoming more pressing as a total of 24 Ospreys will be stationed soon at the Futenma, which is often referred to as “the world’s most dangerous air base.”
Surveys conducted in last November and December by the Okinawa prefectural and municipal governments have found that the Ospreys flew in violation of the US-Japan Joint Committee Agreement, in terms of flight routes and flight time schedule (see this Okinawa Prefectural Government report in Japanese).
Also, surveys by Takeshi Tokashiki, a University of the Ryukyus professor and expert on acoustics, have revealed that the levels of noise and LFS generated by Ospreys are higher than those estimated in the DoD’s “Environmental Review” and in the Okinawa Defense Bureaus’ “Environmental Impact Statement” for the Futenma relocation plan (see this Ryukyushimpo article).
To counter Okinawa's contentions, the Japanese Ministry of Defense has released a report in July that concludes that
Osprey operations in Okinawa are in observation of the regulations set by the US Joint Committee Agreement (see this MoD's briefing document in Japanese) The Japanese government justifies the deployment by arguing that
the Osprey deployment to Okinawa is “of great significance to Japan’s national
security.” (see this Prime Minster's Cabinet press conference excerpt).
Angry, weary, and frustrated
Okinwan islanders, including those who are pro-Tokyo politicians, are angry and indignant at how utterly the US
military and the Japanese government have ignored their democratic voice and
forced the Osprey deployment on them. Many are also alarmed as they see the
deployment as part of the continuing militarization of the islands. At present,
Okinawa faces the construction of a US military airport in Henoko and Oura Bay
and the construction of six helipads at Takae in the Yanbaru forest (the unfolding saga of Agent Orange issues are also distressing Okinawan islanders as well. See Jon Mitchell's Japantimes article).
At the same time, many islanders have become weary of
and frustrated with the ineffectiveness of Okinawa’s political power and
actions and with the prospects of what they could actually do to challenge the situation
vis-a-vie the Japanese government and US military. For example, despite his warning in July last year that “we will have to make a move toward (demanding)
the immediate closure of all of the U.S. bases in Okinawa Prefecture (if an
Osprey accident occurs) (see this Asahi Shimbun article), what Governor Nakaima has been able to do so far is just taking his complaints and
demands for the withdrawal of the deployment plan to the US and the Japanese
governments. And this has been to no avail.
Some protesters at the Futenma Air Station's Nodake
gate have grown impatient with their “non-violent and democratic means of
protest and direct action.” Although
the organizers of the protest are determined to continue their current style of
protest as the “Okinawan way,” they are re-examining the definition of “direct
action” and contemplating new strategies.
US Military Keeps Distance from Protestors
![]() |
Protester Sending his Messages to US military Servicemen in Car Photo by Osamu Makishi |
Given the intensifying situation, however, it remains to be seen whether the Japanese government and US military can continue to steer clear of confrontation. Any violent confrontation could escalate the protest, which could have an immense impact on the presence of the US military bases in Okinawa as well as on the overall US-Japan security relationship.
The most violent confrontation between
Okinawans and US military took place on December 20, 1970. In what is known as the Koza riot (koza sodo), 5,000 Okinawans clashed with US servicemen and MPs. 60 US military
servicemen were injured, 80 cars were burned and some 20 Okinawans were arrested
(see this wikipedia site; see also Jon Mitchell's Japantimes article). It was considered as a spontaneous eruption of Okinawa’s
anger towards the US military’s 25 year occupation of the islands. Two years
after the Koza riot, the Reversion of Okinawa to Japan took place in 1972.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿